Restoration dialogue with a Hibernian twist

Actress by Anne Enright

At one point in Taylor Smith’s Miss Americana, there’s a montage of scenes from her previous album tours. Each tour is a world apart from the previous. The entire performance is rechoreographed. All costumes, sets and dancers are reimagined. Swift tells us that female artists must reinvent themselves constantly to remain relevant, to remain palatable. At the time of filming Miss Americana, Swift was 29 and fully aware of her impending expiration date. She knows she’s on borrowed time. Regardless of the work it took to reach such heights, most female artists either fade or crash out of view after a certain age. A lucky few move into production roles. Female writers might be spared to some extent, but as Anne Enright has documented, very few female writers break through in the first place.

Taylor Swift is one of a long line of global stars. Her tribulations play out in real time on a billion small screens around the world. The global star phenomenon is relatively recent. In her latest novel, Anne Enright explores the life one of the first generation of global stars, Katherine O’Dell, who came of age in the post-war era and was an Irish theatre giant of her time. She performed on the West End, Broadway, and in Hollywood films. The story begins with O’Dell long dead, her later years mired in controversy. When Holly Devane, a postgraduate student arrives at the home of O’Dell’s only daugher Norah, she amuses and annoys Norah in her attempt to label Katherine O’Dell’s “sexual style”. This confrontation compels Norah to tell her mother’s story.

Enright’s Katherine O’Dell reads like a metaphor for the modern Irish state. We begin with the revelation that O’Dell was born in London to English parents – a fact that managed to remain out of the public domain. O’Dell’s father was the son of a British solider in Fermoy. Her father’s Catholicism functioned as the main cultural connection to Ireland. O’Dell came of age in the post-war period in the years in and around the declaration of the Irish Republic. She concocted her own Irish identity as a teenager on tour around Ireland with her actor parents on the rural theatre circuit. In a stage review of a Broadway show, a critic referred to her as O’Dell rather than her mother’s surname Odell. “Odell” went through a similar process of transliteration – an Anglophone’s impression of an Irish name – that all Gaelic surnames suffered at the hands of British colonists. As her star rose, she played an Irish woman so well she passed as Irish. No one ever questioned her Irishness. She became the global idea of Ireland, starring in butter ads and singing at Irish emigrant events. Later in life, after the major incident that led to her demise, a Garda from Gweedore reported that she spoke to him in a gibberish she claimed was Irish. Her gibberish, the Garda said, was a fairly good impression of the Irish language.

Some people are born stars. O’Dell had early opportunities to emerge as she stepped in to replace actors on her parents’ tour. The other players recognised her for what she was. She arrived in the acting world fully formed. She understood how to work the camera better than the directors. When she stepped out on stage, everything fell into place. Despite her rare gift, like every woman, she too had an expiry date. She left America for Ireland with a small, “privately” conceived child that does not appear to be the product of her stage-managed marriage to a gay co-star.

Enright’s novel moves recursively through key events and characters as Norah tries to make meaning of her mother’s life. In telling the story of Katherine O’Dell, Norah tells her own story. Norah cycles through a series of concerns, her unknowable paternity, her mother’s mysterious sexual life, the men that gathered around her in support and in judgement, and the bizarre event that led to her mother’s incarceration.

Taylor Swift knows she’s on borrowed time because of the Katherine O’Dells who went before her, their lives carefully studied and deconstructed. No solution has been found or proposed for the fact that our culture has an appetite only for young females. Half the Internet’s energy consumption goes into serving up images of young females, with an ever sliding scale of how young. We’ve long been sold the idea that the global market functions as some objective measure of value. Blame for something so abstract isn’t easily assigned. The market wants what it wants, we are told, as if we have no hand in the fine tuning and marketing of wholesale desire.

O’Dell makes failed trips back and forth across the Anglo-American world. She goes on smaller touring circuits. She is stubborn and ego-centric. At the same time as she finds herself written off as expired goods, male figures install themselves in the arts and literary world without having to work to maintain their position. These men emit no creative light of their own. They never deem themselves too old or undeserving of any pleasure or opportunity. They build their own empires off networks of artists. They manoeuvre themselves into positions where O’Dell has to seek their permission to work. They sit behind the camera and whisper about her and dismiss her. They laugh at her attempts to reinvent herself. She succumbs to heavy drinking and a cocktail of prescription medication.

Norah keeps pushing and uncovers a source of darkness in O’Dell’s past. In true Irish fashion, blame remains nonassignable. Even during Katherine O’Dell’s trial, responsibility for her own actions is diminished. Injustice seems societal and unspecific. Enright writes injustice into the very air we breathe.

Every now and again, Norah speaks directly to a “you” – her husband. Their union seems like the centripetal force tethering Norah to a life of stability compared to her mother’s. The “you” of this novel had encouraged Norah to write about her mother. The “you” of this story gave her permission. This reminds me of ancient Greek novels I studied such as the Aethiopica, where the story is female driven, but all successful female characters had a network of supportive men guiding them at all times. Women like O’Dell, who lived without male blessing, had negative outcomes.

O’Dell and Norah’s story unfolds to reveal not only their own story but a cultural history of Dublin. Each scene, sentence and phrase builds an impression of modern Ireland with all its porter bellies and rebel tunes. Enright’s writing style comes close to achieving what Nobel Prize winner Orhan Pamuk does in his novels: a gentle unfurling of the soul of a nation disguised as a book.

Is that all there is?

Diving For Pearls by Jamie O’Connell

The plot of Diving for Pearls centres around the death of Hiyam, a young Emirati woman. The novel flows through the voices of several characters. Through them, we discover her fate. For the most part, Diving for Pearls concerns itself with the actions and choices of one Irish family. The heart of the novel rests within the shifts of consciousness in Trevor, the troubled younger brother of Siobhán. Siobhán summons Trevor to Dubai where she has been living with her husband and children since the 2008 economic collapse. Like the dead Emirati woman, Trevor too ended up in open water as a result of a misspent evening. Siobhán thinks she can save Trevor without realising that she’s more lost than him.

Dubai feels like something out of a Mark Fisher book. It manifests as an expression of pure capitalist realism. Within its city limits, the global caste system is on full display. Public space is so inhospitable that if you attempt to spend time outdoors, you risk being seared to death by the sun. Refuge of any sort can be found only within the private shopping malls and hotels.

While O’Connell writes complex Irish characters, the foreign characters lack a certain dimensionality. On this point, I give O’Connell the benefit of the doubt. Diving For Pearls seems less interested in rendering characters’ rich inner worlds than in demonstrating that for every northern indulgence some southern family pays the price. This book has strong parallels with Jordan Peele’s film Us, where the Wilson family confronts the horror of their doppleganger family. The Wilson’s material gains result in torment and hardship for their counterparts who exist in a parallel underworld. O’Connell’s characters of non-white descent suffer endlessly and needlessly so that the white characters’ good fortune continues.

Within this novel, those with money are godless while the impoverished are pious. The worship of both capital and god relies on higher powers. These higher powers remain abstracted and unaccountable but widely believed. In the end, everyone relies on little more than hope. As Siobhán’s good fortunes flip from one moment to the next, in what is a comical scene, she tries to remember how to pray. In Diving for Pearls, Christianity provides a quiet sense of community. The Christians of diverse nationalities gather together to worship but also to commune with one another. The consumers seek individuals with whom they can binge in tandem. Both have a price.

O’Connell’s writing becomes urgent and compelling when he writes about faith. This seems a feature of the latest generation of Irish artists. While their fluency in Christian doctrine probably came through involuntary indoctrination, its immutable presence shapes their art. O’Connell’s writing expresses a final exhalation of Irish Christianity.

The Siobhán of this novel embodies the archetypal sleepwalking consumer of capital. She names her children Rocco and Milo after the new global deities. When Trevor enquires about the palpable inequality evident in Dubai, she’s quick to rationalise this as a law of nature. Someone has to slave! A certain comedy arises when Siobhán passes comment about Gete, her Ethiopian housemaid whose prospects of making a living in her homeland were robbed by foreign interests and whose entire fate rests in Siobhán’s hands. Siobhán thinks Gete fails to understand what is important in life, aka designer goods. Gete, knowing better than to ever comment, seems pregnant with opinion.

When Siobhán drags her family out to witness an actor scale the Burj Khalifa, the supreme moment of bearing witness fails to offset the discomfort of the voyage. Worship stripped of its religiosity splits Siobhán open for a moment. She realises that her entire life has been built on a lie; she chose luxury over ever knowing true desire. Her life’s milestones are garnished with disappointment. Nothing in her life has lived up to the hype. After this brief confessional moment, she returns to normal. Despite experiencing a great change in fortune, she doesn’t have the wherewithal to become conscious of the source of her malaise. Siobhán, as an embodiment of the general Irish population, and some might argue the entire global north, demonstrates comedic acts of cognitive dissonance.

Dublin and Dubai fail to differ enough to draw a strong contrast. Moving thousands of miles from one to the other offers distance rather than difference. For Trevor, Dubai might lead to a life post-Lucy Quirke. For Aasim, Dublin allows him the liberty of sharing a bed with a man without fear but also without love. Outside of that, both men know nothing but excess. Trevor tries to steel himself through building a thick muscular exoskeleton. Aasim flashes money to court friendships.

The one question I have is whether O’Connell could have written Diving For Pearls without Trevor. While O’Connell animates Trevor’s awakening with great skill, Trevor reads like a metaphor for the Labour Party or the American Democratic party. Although his lifestyle leads to the death and destruction of the global south, he retains the capacity to display some awareness and remorse. He understands the ills of the world enough for the rest of us to buy into him as a form of hope. Ultimately, he might change course but the change isn’t radical. A Diving For Pearls without a Trevor to add empathy would have been more realistic but less palatable.

Siobhán’s husband Martin remains voiceless throughout the novel. Everything that happens, happens because of his sense of entitlement. His shady dealings both stand up and tear down the lives of Siobhán and the boys. Martin lies beyond reach. He is both guilty and conscious of his actions. He may not mean to murder but he still robbed Hiyam of her life. Capitalism doesn’t mean to tear the planet to ribbons. The destruction of life and the environment is an unfortunate byproduct. Following the same natural order that necessitates modern slavery, Martin will never see the inside of a jail cell. His steady cash flow tethers him positively to his offspring even after all he has done. Even after her confrontations with reality, Siobhán continues to accept his money. The entire planet will plunge into flames and every one of us will die before Martin’s air conditioned apartment will experience mild brownouts. Martin represents everything that happens in the shadows. Deep down, we all know that the deals that Martin makes keep the known world spinning on its axis. Deep down, we’re all varying shades of Siobhán. In a metaphorical sense, we all choose Martin. If ‘he’ were to stop, some of the global north’s luxury would cease to exist. Martin goes unprosecuted because to prosecute Martin would mean confronting our own culpability.

Nothing is real. Nothing is certain or eternal. As quick as all this has been created, like Sodom and Gommorah, it can come undone. As much as Emirati wealth can couch them in luxury, the bodies still pile up. Sometimes they find their own family members among the casualties. As the fire grows nearer, the smoke will engulf us all.

What a masterful first novel from Jamie O’Connell.